Notre-Dame de Paris
To take full advantage of Flickr, you should use a JavaScript-enabled browser and
install the latest version of the Macromedia Flash Player .
Equirectangular panorama built from 32 pictures (EXIF data from the first one).
Best seen very large . See also its
stereographic projection .
Comments
Wow! Looks amazing in full size. Great job!
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
I love the sign on the floor (which I only
saw when I saw the original size). I'm
continually amazed by your panoramas !
When you take them, do you take something
like 16 for the top and 16 for the bottom ?
or does the 18mm give you enough to take them
as a single row of photos ?
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
Excellent job. You can see the handheld
nadir... it looks like you tried the
"bump the ISO nadir" trick.
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
@juangp: I do 3 rows of 10 pictures, plus
zenith and nadir. (I could go with 9
pictures per row, but my panoramic head only
support 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 18, 24, 36 or 72
pictures per row and if I set it up for 18
and skip every other stop, I pretty sure to
miss one at some point.)
@Seb: yes, nadir is a 1" shot at ISO
1600 (since the other pictures are 13"
at ISO 100, I think nadir should have been
0.8", but it's still too much for
handheld anyway).
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
BTW the man you can see with his camera on
the left was setting up a fancy shot: a long
exposure into which he and his friend cloned
themselves three times using a strobe light.
I had to redo one of my shots because of his
flashes.
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
seamless beauty
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
Beautiful night pano.
Your projections are very well thought (the
center point is always relevant), but why
don't you include a link to the interactive Spi-V viewer anymore? Although it takes a long time to
load, I still love to view panos this way
(and I still think that for Internet sharing
you do no need to generate a 7500 x 3750
pixels picture, my 20" screen has only
1680 x 1050).
Now I can tell there were seaguls in the
sky, and that you dropped your Metro ticket
on the ground.
Technically, why did you use such a low ISO
(say 100) and long exposure time (13")?
Was that an artistical option, for instance
to have the people around look like shadows?
Could it work with let's say ISO 400 and 1
second?
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
@pano_philou: thanks.
- I never linked to (nor used) Spi-V
because it requires shockwave .
- The licence of this picture allows you to do more than
just view it on your screen... For other
uses such as printing or computing another projection it's nice to have the high definition. Also
I'm not only sharing: I'm storing !
- I think 3" at ISO400 would just be
noisier than 13" at ISO100.
Posted 21 months ago.
( permalink
)
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
This photo also belongs to:
Additional Information
Some rights reserved
Anyone can see this photo